The questionnaire contains 3 parts. Area We provided issues out-of socio-demographic investigation (age, quantity of degree, parity, familial money, career, most recent relationship updates, sexual activity, reputation for HPV vaccination, and you will reputation of irregular cervical malignant tumors assessment).

Area II comprised of 6 questions regarding the prospective ladies who is going to be processed, age first off, volume, years otherwise criteria to stop off examination, and methods away from evaluating. Only the members that has heard out-of HPV create just do it to Area III and that assessed information about HPV from the sorts of (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), setting out-of sign and you may cures.

Before the study, the fresh questionnaire away from region II and you may part III within the Thai adaptation was basically considered, discussed, and you can changed until opinion certainly 20 scientists who had been all of the gynecologic oncologists (some were authors various other synchronous knowledge). The pros ranked each of 19 issues once the possibly ‘relevant' or ‘maybe not relevant'. The object-height Content Legitimacy Index (I-CVI) are calculated each item, and the Articles Authenticity List (CVI) try calculated by firmly taking an average ratio off fourteen questions about knowledge about cervical cancer tests and 5 questions relating to HPV. New CVI was in fact step 1 both for elements of the latest questionnaire (S1 Table). New precision is checked-out into the 30 female with the exact same characteristic because the participants. The newest Cronbach' leader coefficients on the reliability had been 0.819 having understanding of cervical malignant tumors assessment and you may 0.907 having information about HPV.

Research collection

Towards date away from booked colposcopy, the research secretary considering pointers of one's studies into the feminine who satisfied addition requirements. The women whom offered to take part offered authored informed concur and you will replied the new survey alone on their own in advance of continuing so you can colposcopy.

Analysis accumulated for it studies was socio-demographic data (Area I of the questionnaire), experience with cervical malignant tumors assessment (Region II), and you can experience in HPV (Region III).

Mathematical data

The brand new solutions of real information regarding cervical malignant tumors examination and you may HPV were assessed by the per items ahead of scoring categorization. Correct answer is actually obtained as the step 1 whereas ‘wrong and you will being unsure of answer' is scored 0.

Out-of 14 questions regarding cervical disease screening, feminine hvor meget koster en typisk postordrebrud whoever score was indeed ? 10 was basically randomly classified since with ‘a beneficial knowledge' otherwise was indeed thought to be with “not good training”. Having knowledge of HPV, feminine whose answer are ‘never heard about HPV' were omitted on the study from HPV training.

Out of 5 issues, female whose get was ? step three was basically regarded as with ‘a good knowledge of HPV' normally because the ‘bad knowledge'. Away from 19 concerns, women whoever score were ? thirteen were classified because that have ‘a beneficial full knowledge' normally while the ‘not good full knowledge'.

All of the study was indeed obtained into the an electronic databases and you may reviewed playing with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were used to analyze demographic studies and you can was described as the wide variety that have fee, mean having practical departure otherwise median which have variety. The fresh organization anywhere between for every varying and you may studies score were examined playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory model is made in the multivariable data as well as the variables probably pertaining to the information score. The fresh new noticed amount of analytical benefits was a great p-property value 0.05 otherwise shorter.

Results

Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>